Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

FN P90 Options
JPCJedi
Posted: Saturday, September 29, 2007 2:17:10 AM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 9/29/2007
Posts: 95
Location: New Jersey

It occurs to me that the most important element of the p90 design is the trigger being right under the barrel at the front. The back of the gun is only as long as a person's forearm, and this can be approximated on a minifig by extending a mechanism housing behind the trigger only as far as it can go, as far as the buttstocks are on the sniper rifle and such. This would produce a p90 similar in size to the SOCOM pistol, which is about right.

Granted, my own fiddling is rather ugly, but I still argue that a bullpup is feasible as an "approximation."

Al's Microphone
Sponsor
Posted: Saturday, September 29, 2007 2:17:10 AM
Damien
Posted: Saturday, September 29, 2007 3:51:34 AM


Rank: Forums Sheriff

Joined: 9/16/2007
Posts: 762
Location: Canada

This is unlikely. I recently discussed this with Will. What I did was take the very picture of the P90 which you have in your post, and I traced out its design in CorelDraw, removing the join between the grip and the buttstock. In essence, the weapon could be made suitable for a minifig hand while maintaining its distinct forward profile.

Will's primary concern here is that it would stray too far from the design of the actual weapon. That's an important part of his items; the fact that they look 'right' in and OUT of a minifig hand. Changes like what you (and I) suggested would detract from the realism of the weapon.

It's a possibility, mind you. But a very remote one. Perhaps if enough people would want a gun designed like this, and if Will's sons think it would look cool, then we'll see it. But don't get your hopes up; it's very unlikely.



The Jester Laughs Because The World Is Full Of Fools
JPCJedi
Posted: Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:19:52 PM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 9/29/2007
Posts: 95
Location: New Jersey
Well, I appreciate that it doesn't fit with Will's design style (although I do still argue that such an "approximation" is similar to Will's Thompson gun). I certainly don't suggest designing such an approximated bullpup would be easy. But for the question of realism vs playability, my vote is for playability any day, with all LEGO, not just minifigs. So I just argue that it's possible to create something that balances both.

Al's Microphone
the enigma that is badger
Posted: Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:53:26 PM


Rank: Official Spokesman

Joined: 9/13/2007
Posts: 1,885
Location: Chicago
JPCJedi wrote:
I certainly don't suggest designing such an approximated bullpup would be easy. But for the question of realism vs playability, my vote is for playability any day, with all LEGO, not just minifigs. So I just argue that it's possible to create something that balances both.


It's not a question of ease or possibility; I have no doubt Will could design an "approximated" P90 and do a fantastic job of it. However, for the reasons Damien discussed above, he doesn't choose to. As for working with "all LEGO", minifigs are by far the primary element that's going to be using Brickarms items, so designing accessories with the anatomy of a minifig in mind is in Will's best interest.

As an example, take a look at another vendor's Sturmgewehr. While their other work is good and the Sturmgewehr doesn't look half bad by itself, if you try to put that weapon in the hands of a minifig, it doesn't work well at all (stock is too long, overall weapon size it out of proportion). Clearly, the designers of that item didn't take into account how good the fit of the item would be in minifig hands and the item suffers for it.

I'm personally glad Will chooses to focus his attention on items of both high playability AND also function as small works of art in regards to stylized representations of modern weapons. I know Will has shown his work to gun enthusiasts who know little to nothing about LEGO or minifigs, and they absolutely love them. Would a hacked-up P90 get the same accolades? I honestly don't believe so.

Captjack wrote:
Never mind a P90 that's look's like a cool pulse pistol sci-fi blaster handgun thingy : D


I know I've seen a similar weapon somewhere before, but I'll be darned if I can remember where. Anyone have an idea?

badger



"... and that's when the C.H.U.D.s came at me"
Captjack
Posted: Saturday, September 29, 2007 9:26:24 PM

Rank: Member

Joined: 9/17/2007
Posts: 21
Location: Tipton
Captjack wrote:
Never mind a P90 that's look's like a cool pulse pistol sci-fi blaster handgun thingy : D

badger wrote:

I know I've seen a similar weapon somewhere before, but I'll be darned if I can remember where. Anyone have an idea?


Now that you mention it hmm maybe it was in a video-game?

"Saving the world for a better tommorow" : USRF General Rick Heines
USRF The future of infantry warfare recruiting now!
obxcrew
Posted: Sunday, September 30, 2007 1:29:24 PM


Rank: Chief Inspector

Joined: 9/16/2007
Posts: 959
Location: Norfolk, VA, USA
I am 100% against 'approximated' Brickarms weapons. If the gun can't be made accurately, just use another weapon.

"Today you get to say "I told you so."
"Today, I don't want to . . . but I did bloody tell you."
GreenLead
Posted: Saturday, October 13, 2007 8:10:33 PM

Rank: Elite Commando

Joined: 9/28/2007
Posts: 200
Location: Kiwiland
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I heard that Will has relaxed his "must point forward" policy.

Jonathan Cordova's gallery on the BA main site features minifigs wielding BA weapons from the side. This inspired me to argue that maybe we DON'T need to shorten or modify the stock of Bullpup weapons.

Besides, Bullpup weapons appy mostly to assault rifles and I don't really see anyone wielding one HUGE assault rifle in EACH hand, no?

Conclusion - maybe Bullpup weapons are doable!


LS DoD appointed Technical Advisor to 2nd Infantry Division's "A" Company and his Flickr
"Some folks don't want peace - they want quiet. But until there is justice, there will be no peace and quiet."
- Rev. Jesse Jackson (modified)
the brick arms maniac [SUSPENDED]
Posted: Sunday, October 14, 2007 8:33:40 AM
Rank: Guest

Joined: 9/18/2007
Posts: 14
Location: a dimansion between soda and a cookie"holland"
The thing is that when a lego minifig is laying down on the flour ,shooting from behind his little bit of cover, it would look kinda weird if he held his gun to the side and not to the front.

BRICK ARMS: DEATH FOR LEGO'S RESURRECTION FOR US!
GreenLead
Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 4:32:37 AM

Rank: Elite Commando

Joined: 9/28/2007
Posts: 200
Location: Kiwiland
I think it's acceptable, given the limited posability of minifigs.

obxcrew wrote:
I am 100% against 'approximated' Brickarms weapons. If the gun can't be made accurately, just use another weapon.


Approximating bullpups which could be wielded cross-body acceptably in their unmodified state is not worth the effort.


LS DoD appointed Technical Advisor to 2nd Infantry Division's "A" Company and his Flickr
"Some folks don't want peace - they want quiet. But until there is justice, there will be no peace and quiet."
- Rev. Jesse Jackson (modified)
JPCJedi
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:17:42 AM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 9/29/2007
Posts: 95
Location: New Jersey
Hmm. Well, in case it's not abundantly clear, I am Jonathan Cordova. So thank you for noticing my work!
the brick arms maniac wrote:
The thing is that when a lego minifig is laying down on the flour ,shooting from behind his little bit of cover, it would look kinda weird if he held his gun to the side and not to the front.
I disagree. You'll notice here and here I have posed soldiers shooting sideways while behind cover, and I believe the sideways firing actually helps the minifig look realistic. Real people fire sideways!

However, I don't argue for bullpups to be held sideways. My argument is this: the only bullpup I know of and like is the p90, for its role on Stargate. It is used on Stargate because the p90 is so SMALL that it just hangs off your belt. So, an equivalent minifig/BrickArms scale p90 would literally be the size of a pistol (as in protruding no further past the minifig's hand than the PPK, with the bullpup mechanism extending back behind the hand grip.

Oh, additionally, bullpups like the p90 can be held facing forward, in one hand, with the mechanism housing resting on top of your forearm, just like a minifig would hold it. In this picture, she doesn't need to use her left arm. If she puts her left hand down, she doesn't need to move the gun anywhere, because the p90 already faces forward (whereas an m4 held with two hands points sideways). She can hold it up with her right arm. Thus bullpups are even easier to make realistic in terms of how they are held by a minifig.

Let me say it this way. Everybody remember Jeff's scout pistol from another vendor?

I'm saying a BrickArms p90 should be built this way:

Again, this image is by no means perfect. But the idea is: Jeff's old scout pistol had a very shallow angle or "rake" in the hand grip, which means the stock behind the hand grip can extend farther than usual. Since a bullpup is just a short muzzle with a mechanism behind the hand grip, a stubby, "fattened" p90 can be approximated as a BrickArm.

Al's Microphone
GreenLead
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:20:53 AM

Rank: Elite Commando

Joined: 9/28/2007
Posts: 200
Location: Kiwiland
Right, then Jonathon. I suppose at the end of the day, each weapon has to be considered on a case-by-case basis.

But having seen your approximated P90, I am less convinced such alterations do justice to the image of the weapon. I can see where you're coming from, assuming that the P90 can also be wielded by a minifig one in each hand. So I supposed we'll all have something to keep our brains busy.

Other bullpups like the Steyr AUG pose a bit more problems. For instance, we now have the extra problem of thebox magazine being loaded from the back. The only way the AUG could be made into a BrickArm while preserving its distinctive shape is to accept the fact that our minifigs are going to have to settle with holding it cross-body. Any attempts are approximating the buttstock and/or the rear-loaded magazine will potentially destroy its appearance.

That's just my two cents.


LS DoD appointed Technical Advisor to 2nd Infantry Division's "A" Company and his Flickr
"Some folks don't want peace - they want quiet. But until there is justice, there will be no peace and quiet."
- Rev. Jesse Jackson (modified)
Will
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:11:52 AM


Rank: Forums Administrator

Joined: 9/12/2007
Posts: 1,012
Location: Redmond, WA
Man, I'm really geting a kick out of this thread! You guys are articulate, and the banter is thought-provoking.

Although Damien and I have gone 'round and 'round on this over the past year, I like what I'm reading! Keep going, guys!
the brick arms maniac [SUSPENDED]
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:41:07 AM
Rank: Guest

Joined: 9/18/2007
Posts: 14
Location: a dimansion between soda and a cookie"holland"
I said laying not standing read the post that you Quote better next time

[ADMIN - Maniac, you have been warned about your behavior on the forums. There is no need to be rude to the contributing members of the forums. I have no choice but to suspend your account. --Will]

BRICK ARMS: DEATH FOR LEGO'S RESURRECTION FOR US!
JPCJedi
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 6:14:13 PM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 9/29/2007
Posts: 95
Location: New Jersey
GreenLead wrote:
Other bullpups like the Steyr AUG pose a bit more problems. For instance, we now have the extra problem of thebox magazine being loaded from the back.
I agree about the AUG, GreenLead. That would be next to impossible to make as a BrickArm; it would require even more reworking than the Thomposon did. The interesting thing is, however, that the AUG actually has two hand grips, which means it would only be held sideways. I'm willing to concede that, while I like to pose my minifigs holding BrickArms sideways, it would have less of a selling point, since you get to see less of the torso decal.

About the p90 again, I've fiddled some more, and I think this is as good as my horrible graphics skills will get it:

The rear stock is just a little to long for a minifig's arm, but in this configuration, shortening and trimming it would be acceptable IMHO.
Remember, this gun would be tiny, as in the PPK with a hunchback.


Okay, so there's my dream for an SG team.

Al's Microphone
GreenLead
Posted: Thursday, October 18, 2007 5:29:45 AM

Rank: Elite Commando

Joined: 9/28/2007
Posts: 200
Location: Kiwiland
The more I think of your latest P90 mockup the more I appreciate your efforts. If you could round out the grip a bit more to resemble the real thing, then a BrickArms P90 would be doable.

Judging by the scale of your composite pic, I think the butt would clear the minifig's arm quite nicely, even when fired from one hand.

I understand where you are coming from regarding blocked torso decals. Personally, I think a minifig's torso decal speaks volumes about the character he/she portrays. But I suppose some people wouldn't mind too much if you can't see the torso in some cases.


LS DoD appointed Technical Advisor to 2nd Infantry Division's "A" Company and his Flickr
"Some folks don't want peace - they want quiet. But until there is justice, there will be no peace and quiet."
- Rev. Jesse Jackson (modified)
the enigma that is badger
Posted: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:28:26 PM


Rank: Official Spokesman

Joined: 9/13/2007
Posts: 1,885
Location: Chicago
Weighing in on a few issues under discussion here, I really like the mock-up P90 designs you've posted, JPCJedi. I'd liken the case of the P90 to that of Will's new MA5C - a bullpup design that's small enough to be used in a one-handed and thus much more easily adapted into a minifig accessory. So long as the stock of the weapon clears the minifig forearm, it works perfectly.

However, I don't think we can extrapolate this design method to larger bullpup-style weapons (the Steyr AUG for instance). Yes, it's true human beings more often than not hold these weapons two-handed and closer to across our chest than one-handed and straight ahead, but it's important to remember that minifig is a caricature of the human form and has markedly different characteristics in regard to body proportion and flexibility. When designing an accessory for the minifig, one has to take those differences in mind in terms of what accessory designs will best fit the limitations of the minifig - namely, natural-looking two handed holds are impossible to achieve with some weapon design.

I realize the ability for a minifig to hold a weapon in a "cross-chested" fashion has been mentioned, but considering most of a minifig's anatomy is meant to be analogous to that of a person, this pose more closely resembles the "port arms" position (with the weapon held parallel to the ground instead of the usual diagonal) as opposed to the most common way a larger rifle is held with one arm bent back and the other more fully extended. The overall impression the cross-chested hold is more of the figure handing the weapon to someone as opposed to firing it.

Compare how natural looking the posing is in JPCJedi's pictures to this MOC minifig by Jeff of "another vendor" fame that featured more articulated arms.

Still, I think you've made a great case of a Brickarms P90 that would require only minimal changes to the design to be a fantastic, instantly recognizable minifig accessory.

badger



"... and that's when the C.H.U.D.s came at me"
BoB
Posted: Friday, October 19, 2007 8:25:44 PM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 9/16/2007
Posts: 55
Location: My house.
Although I'm not against it or anything, I just think that it's all rather pointless. Maybe an approximated P90 would work, but as Badger and I think others have mentioned, most other bullpups wouldn't. And although JPCJedi's mockups look great, I just don't recognize that as a P90. It looks like some futuristic super pistol, which is great, except it's supposed to be a P90...



Everyone makes mistakes. That's why most crayons are non-toxic. (-AJR)
><>
GreenLead
Posted: Friday, October 19, 2007 10:26:17 PM

Rank: Elite Commando

Joined: 9/28/2007
Posts: 200
Location: Kiwiland
That's probably because he's using the handle from a another vendor Scout Blaster. Still, we've got to commend JPCJedi for at least giving it a try. (On second thoughts, if he rounded out the grip and hand guard a wee bit more...it would be perfect)

I see what the problem is with weapons like the Steyr AUG. Mind you, while it's actually not something I am desperate to have Will produce, it's just the first thing that popped into my head when I saw this thread.

badger wrote:
Compare how natural looking the posing is in JPCJedi's pictures to this MOC minifig by Jeff of "another vendor" fame that featured more articulated arms.


Badger, I had a look. I would have to agree with you - to a certain degree. I've actually tried looking for those articulated joints, to no avail. I think that until people are happy with trying to pose their minifigs firing bullpups cross-body or TLC starts producing more articulate joints, I guess there's not a lot I can do with weapons like the FN F2000 and the Steyr AUG.

Great discussing this with everyone though. Any new suggestions please post to this thread and PM me afterwards.


LS DoD appointed Technical Advisor to 2nd Infantry Division's "A" Company and his Flickr
"Some folks don't want peace - they want quiet. But until there is justice, there will be no peace and quiet."
- Rev. Jesse Jackson (modified)
JPCJedi
Posted: Saturday, October 20, 2007 10:22:19 PM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 9/29/2007
Posts: 95
Location: New Jersey
Well, I'm very glad and thankful for the complements on my mockups. I only hope I have similarly impressed Will enough for when *ahem*mold four*ahem* comes around. ;)

I agree that my mockup only applies to the p90. Let me admit this: until I saw GreenLead's photo of the AUG, the p90 is the only bullpup I knew about, so I was really intending this thread only for the p90. So BoB is right--the other bullpups would not be suitable to BrickArming.

However, when the bullpup mechanism is small enough, it can be omitted, which Will did in the new MA5C.

Al's Microphone
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

YAFVision Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1 (NET v2.0) - 9/1/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.